When I started teacher training, in 1974, I was an extremely green, naive, unconfident person with no sense of self and an abiding conviction that I was 'not good at anything.'
Reading John Holt's 'Why Children Fail' in my first week at college had such a profound effect (my personal school career had been an almost total disaster) - and the other thing that really got to me was this word that was bandied around the whole time - 'work'.
'Work', to me, was something unpleasant and distasteful - and here I was, learning how to make 'work' for children. It made me deeply unhappy and I think this was where (unconsciously at the time) I started to feel that children should be allowed to do things they liked doing - the seeds of my current life tenet, which is to LET PEOPLE BE.
What you say here is just so, so good. I have felt more and more in recent years that society needs a complete shake-up - we need to stop accepting certain things as norms, and start to LIVE in a more happy and fulfilled way.
If I ever DO start my 'Happiness Revolution', your words will form a very large part of it.
I highly recommend the Ruth Cowan’s book More Work for Mother published in 1983. It clearly shows that technological innovation simply raises the bar on the amount of work mothers are expected to do. The advance of washing machines and dishwashers simply did not reduce the amount of housework for women. I personally think it is an underrated masterpiece.
Part of the reason we work so much is to have nice (and expensive) things - especially a beautiful house, quality educations for our children, great tasting food, and comfortable, reliable cars.
Here are some rough annual expenses for an American household with a mortgage.
20K on mortgage
15K per child on education
10K on cars
7K on food
5K on medical care
Add this up for a family with two kids = 72K/year.
Where does the education money go? Peter gives us an important clue, and I don’t agree with everything Peter says, but we should pay special attention to where our money is going.
Here is Peter.
“But we also have an ever-growing number of jobs that seem completely useless or even harmful. As examples, we have administrators and assistant administrators in ever larger numbers shuffling papers (or digital documents) that don’t need to be shuffled, corporate lawyers and their staffs helping big companies and billionaires pay less than their fair share of taxes, countless people in the financial industries doing who knows what mischief, lobbyists using every means possible to further corrupt our politicians, and advertising executives and sales personnel pushing stuff that nobody needs or really wants.”
“The median monthly cost of homeownership in the US is $1,672 per month, according to the most recent data from the Census Bureau's 2021 American Community Survey. That cost includes not only the monthly mortgage payment, but also other necessary costs like homeowners insurance, HOA fees, and property taxes.” https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/average-mortgage-payment?op=1
Scott, thank you for this valuable addition to the letter. One reason for our continued long workweek that I didn't touch on in the letter is this: We are culturally ingrained to want more stuff--big houses, fancy cars, expensive (and generally useless) schooling for our kids, and on and on--rather than to want more time to enjoy ourselves and one another. Wanting more stuff feeds the economy as it exists. It leads to evermore exhaustion of the planet and evermore money in the pockets of the rich. We have stuff but little time to enjoy it.
The dominant role of work in identity might be said to also reflect the time when various communities determined that they needed surnames to better identify themselves and many took the name of their trade or occupation. I have known a number of Sawyers over the years but have never met anyone practicing that trade. Having spent 30 years in government service as a diplomat who when posted abroad was considered to always be available for duty I sympathize with the reality about make work jobs though I also found that different people given the same responsibilities could either make a real contribution or could simply fill the the role for a time.
I've had two periods of prolonged unemployment or under employment in my adult life. Each time, I have been more than able to fill most of the time with purposeful work that brought me a lot more self esteem and sense of accomplishment than nearly any job I've had has provided.
During the first period, our child with Aspergers was struggling in school in ways that made conventional employment with limited time off and no scheduling flexibility untenable.
What did I do with all my free time? I ended up taking on three different volunteer roles of varying commitment. One was roughly equivalent to working about 15 hours a week, but was mostly flexible and bought me a lot of goodwill with teachers and staff at my son's school... which helped me garner tremendously more empathy AND resources for him to succeed at school. By investing my time in the school, I received critical social and practical investment back in turn for my son's benefit. It was worth every hour. My other roles served general community interests and advocacy and gave me a good outlet for my professional skills and interest in helping others, but without being a 40 hour a week expectation. This was the time in my life when I felt I was *actually* having the most positive impact on the world as a person. If someone had wanted to pay me to keep doing it even once my son no longer needed the support, I would have LOVED that.
This second time, having been pushed to the edge of my patience for intentional stupidity and being undervalued during the pandemic I've basically become the contractor responsible for making many long postponed, but necessary maintenance projects and upgrades to our aging house. I also redoubled my efforts at my sewing and wood working hobbies. Coupling these tasks with listening to podcasts and audiobooks, I feel like I'm still pretty well intellectually engaged most of the time.
I can't say we've made up my lost income in the savings of doing the labor of these things myself, but the sense of satisfaction of having learned to do these things myself is priceless, and it's an investment in learning I can continue to build upon now that I have a lot more confidence. I've also invested more effort into intentional meal planning, so we're eating a lot healthier, have minimal food waste, and the grocery budget is pretty consistent (and lower than it was) from month to month.
Investing in my home and my family has brought me a lot of purpose and sense of accomplishment. If I could find a suitable part time job, I might consider it, but for right now what many companies demand is too much for what they actually pay, and there really ends up being no reward for being more efficient and better at the job than just getting assigned EVEN MORE WORK in way too many settings.
Now, when I've finished my "to do" list for the day, I CAN BE DONE and spend the rest of my free time however it suits me, instead of being expected to stay at work for a set amount of time because the churn of the responsibilities never ends and always exceeds what can reasonably be done by the always inadequate staffing. :P
I love reading everyone else's comments. For me in the past years work has been round the clock to the point that when there is a holiday I don't know what to do with myself. For me I feel if comes from my family, and my grandparents for that matter but my parent sa s well and my community overall. In Romania people used to be homesteaders before communism and during communism those that were too rooted to move to towns remained homesteaders. My grandparents for that reason remained homesteaders while mom and her siblings moved to town for what they though brought better perspectives. Yet every weekend they were back to the homestead helping parents(double to work I d say) . For me now across the glove I still fondly remember the lifestyle that was emersed in work. But work that is meaningful and community based and supporting the whole village . So much to say but yes for me work remains the essence of me and so far I don't see it as a burden. We run two schools and this is what we give back to the community where we are.
My first serious job was back in 1985 working in an English Residential Therapeutic Community. I was 23 and after enjoying an extremely good time before work - I welcomed the challenge and chose to work a 70-80 hour week. I did this for about 10 years and then our hours were reduced to about 65 per week. If one possibility is that work can become play - I was very fortunate.
My work was not always play but it was a great learning opportunity when it was hard. In my view, it is not a good thing that people should be restricted by government bureaucracies which are anything but playful, in deciding how to spend one's time. Thankfully I was never deprived by the imposition of the 40-hour week and my life has benefited greatly by the abundant opportunity to work/play. For the last 15 years, I have become self-employed so I can work/play as much as I like :)
How much of this phenomenon has been bolstered by the cold war? I'm thinking back to the space race, the fear-mongering, the sum of efforts to get all Americans/Westerners into the same mindset. We had to show - regardless of the soundness of the underpinnings, regardless of the cultural prices paid, that capitalism was THE right way.. lest the commies take over!
As if there isn't enough anxiety already inherent amongst Us! Yet we're taught to value the superficial BS. Who cares if we're clinically anxious or depressed, as long as we can maintain the facade of success, as long as we can "keep up with the Joneses"? ....Yes the war has shifted for lack of a remote enemy to having to appear to be better off than our next door neighbors.
Much of this is indeed fueled by capitalism. Companies are valued largely on their projected growth; in order to continually grow craftmanship takes the backseat to the almighty bottom line, consumerism becomes a necessity while job satisfaction suffers.
This does not feel like freedom - what we were told we've been working, if not "fighting" for during my entire life as an American.. This feels more like a bad hangover, where we've gotten artificially high and are now left wondering - with aching heads & hearts, where the F--- are we & how did we get here?
As long as we value having more stuff, especially for the sake of the appearance of status or of being a good Consumerican over genuine utility, we will find this trap inescapable - for we are fueling the phenomenon.
Perhaps you may ask yourself kindly: Do I have a need to feel or appear "better off" than other folks and have I decided to make this a core component of my life's happiness? If so, how has that worked out over time? Furthermore, how does allowing a society to determine my life values jibe with true freedom?
Ironically, the West is supposed to be about freedom and individualism - it is only We, through conscious choices, who can take that power back.
So, I don't think it's too surprising that car-centric urban planning has atomized us and made it difficult to socialize outside of work. One thing that's been found to help with people having better life satisfaction is impromptu meetings with acquaintances and friends, which is one of the underlying reasons for Barcelona's build out of Superblocks to radically increase the amount of available public space in the city.
Peter, your reflections are truly insightful. It’s a pleasure to engage with perspectives shaped by such a wealth of experience, especially in a world that has evolved so profoundly over time. Thank you for sharing your thoughtful observations.
i have another take on this topic and play.
This is from an article I'm writing, which I may or may not publish:
"When my kids moved to high school I was so shocked to see the dramatic change in play forced upon them. When they were at primary school they would play every spare minute in the playgound - monkey bars and other equipment. I loved doing this with them. But there was none of this at high school. There was some exercise equipment more orientated towards older students / adults, but that was it.
Suddenly the kids were expected to be "mature" and that "that stuff is for children". I have read so much about how we force education upon our children like we are "educating them for harvard" and how they have lost their natural play. But play is a natural part of their education, as it used to be for our ancestors.
Humans existed as "hunters and gathers" for 99% of our 2.5 million year history. They were relatively peaceful people who grew up in communities where everyone looked out for everyone else. All adults looked out for all the children. In fact, allo-parenting, where multiple people raised a child was quite normal. The children learnt through play, and it didn't suddenly end when they turned 12, they could continue playing as long as they honored their other duties (so yes, some growing up was required, however it was a natural progression over time rather than a forced expected change). Respect and play was a natural part of their makeup. It makes sense that modern day humans have this instinct laid down in our DNA. But modern day morality and expectations seems to be killing it. And I believe there is an internal conflict between our nature as expressed in our DNA and societal expectations."
You talk about solutions to how we pay people differently. I have another idea for you.This is from another set of ideas I am playing with. I included a discussions of The Multiple Value Economy, as separate to our current day capitalist system that boils everything down to one thing - money. https://www.joyism.nexus/discussions/manyTokensEconomy
I haven't concluded this yet. I need to work out how this would come together, but I feel I am on to something. I'm happy to hear your thoughts:
"The Multiple Value Economy could offer an alternative to traditional, money-centric capitalism by recognizing a broader range of contributions to society, incentivizing social and environmental good, and fostering collaboration over competition. By creating tokens that reward specific domains like health, sustainability, community service, and creativity, we could create a system where wealth is multidimensional and rooted in diverse social values. This approach would empower individuals to contribute according to their passions and values, promote local economies, and reduce corporate monopolies by enabling more flexible and domain-based token exchanges. Ultimately, such an economy could support well-being and purpose-driven actions alongside financial gain, creating a more inclusive and resilient society."
You touch on capitalism. To be clear, I think Capitalism is our number one problem, but people are so caught up in it they can't see that. I don't want to bore you with my diatribe, so feel free to skip this last part if you have heard it all before. From https://www.joyism.nexus/capitalism
"Capitalism has been the dominant economic system on our planet for approximately 10,000 years, since its emergence during the Agricultural Age. This free market system allows individuals or groups to operate independently without government intervention, fostering innovation and growth.
As a result of capitalism’s prevalence, significant improvements have been made in human well-being. For instance, average life expectancy has increased dramatically from 31 years in 1900 to 72.6 years in 2020.
However, despite these successes, our planet is facing an alarming decline in its health and ability to support humanity. Unfortunately, many people remain unaware of this reality, and as a democratic world, we continue on the same path without making significant changes.
Capitalism’s primary objective is to maximise shareholder value. It is about money and nothing else.
It’s astonishing that the will of shareholders hasn’t prioritized considering people, animals, and the planet in guiding the direction of companies. Despite warnings about climate change dating back to the 1930s, discussions on necessary changes have been ongoing since the late 1980s. The first global summit took place as far back as 1996. Yet, year after year, we witness record-breaking global temperatures, alarming species extinction rates, and more. Unfortunately, nothing has changed. Capitalism’s misaligned incentives render it incapable of addressing these pressing issues.
Capitalism’s primary beneficiaries are those who already possess capital, allowing them to accumulate wealth more easily while those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder struggle to advance. Although taxation aims to redistribute wealth, the wealthy often exploit loopholes in the tax system to their advantage."
Indeed, John Maynard Keynes, along with many other futurists, predicted that with the increases in productivity due to technology, the average workweek would eventually shrink to 15 hours by the end of the 20th century. Of course, that clearly didn't happen, since the oligarchs took nearly all the fruits of the productivity gains since the early 1970s, thanks to neoliberalism and the oligarchs' inane and insane addiction to growth for the sake of growth, the ideology of the cancer cell which eventually kills its host.
I will say though that work was not necessarily more exhausting in previous decades. It may have appeared that way perhaps, but keep in mind that the overall PACE of work (and life in general) was much slower back then as well. Faster pace in general, and *a fortiori* if non-linear and often unpredictable, has to be at least somewhat more exhausting, if not physically, then at least mentally.
An exponentially faster pace AND the same (or greater) number of working hours as 1938 (!) is a recipe for burnout.
But yes, it is still true nonetheless that adults have literally forgotten how to play. That state of mind that people seek to experience at work? It's known as "flow". And "flow" is, at base, indistinguishable from what USED to be derived from play.
Peter, your words make my heart sing.
When I started teacher training, in 1974, I was an extremely green, naive, unconfident person with no sense of self and an abiding conviction that I was 'not good at anything.'
Reading John Holt's 'Why Children Fail' in my first week at college had such a profound effect (my personal school career had been an almost total disaster) - and the other thing that really got to me was this word that was bandied around the whole time - 'work'.
'Work', to me, was something unpleasant and distasteful - and here I was, learning how to make 'work' for children. It made me deeply unhappy and I think this was where (unconsciously at the time) I started to feel that children should be allowed to do things they liked doing - the seeds of my current life tenet, which is to LET PEOPLE BE.
What you say here is just so, so good. I have felt more and more in recent years that society needs a complete shake-up - we need to stop accepting certain things as norms, and start to LIVE in a more happy and fulfilled way.
If I ever DO start my 'Happiness Revolution', your words will form a very large part of it.
Thank you so very much.
I highly recommend the Ruth Cowan’s book More Work for Mother published in 1983. It clearly shows that technological innovation simply raises the bar on the amount of work mothers are expected to do. The advance of washing machines and dishwashers simply did not reduce the amount of housework for women. I personally think it is an underrated masterpiece.
This is fascinating. I am working on a novel that is set in a post-work future. It is fun to think about.
Amen to that!
Thank you Peter.
Why do we work so much?
Part of the reason we work so much is to have nice (and expensive) things - especially a beautiful house, quality educations for our children, great tasting food, and comfortable, reliable cars.
Here are some rough annual expenses for an American household with a mortgage.
20K on mortgage
15K per child on education
10K on cars
7K on food
5K on medical care
Add this up for a family with two kids = 72K/year.
Note that education spending is very high.
American schools are spending over $15,000 a year per student. Verify for yourself. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_236.55.asp
Where does the education money go? Peter gives us an important clue, and I don’t agree with everything Peter says, but we should pay special attention to where our money is going.
Here is Peter.
“But we also have an ever-growing number of jobs that seem completely useless or even harmful. As examples, we have administrators and assistant administrators in ever larger numbers shuffling papers (or digital documents) that don’t need to be shuffled, corporate lawyers and their staffs helping big companies and billionaires pay less than their fair share of taxes, countless people in the financial industries doing who knows what mischief, lobbyists using every means possible to further corrupt our politicians, and advertising executives and sales personnel pushing stuff that nobody needs or really wants.”
Other references for my numbers are below.
A monthly and yearly break of expenses.
Housing - $1,050/month, $12,600/ year
Transportation - $820/month, $9,830/year
Taxes - $780/month, $9,410/year
Utilities & house - $730/month, $8,810/year
Food - $610/month, $7,320/year
Social Security - $600/month, $7,250/year
Health care - $430/month, $5,360/year
Entertainment - $240/month, $2,920/year
https://www.valuepenguin.com/average-household-budget#food
About 90% of home buyers choose a 30-year fixed-rate loan, making it the most popular mortgage type in the country.
https://www.mpamag.com/us/mortgage-industry/guides/the-7-most-popular-types-of-mortgage-loans-for-home-buyers/255499
“The median monthly cost of homeownership in the US is $1,672 per month, according to the most recent data from the Census Bureau's 2021 American Community Survey. That cost includes not only the monthly mortgage payment, but also other necessary costs like homeowners insurance, HOA fees, and property taxes.” https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/average-mortgage-payment?op=1
Scott, thank you for this valuable addition to the letter. One reason for our continued long workweek that I didn't touch on in the letter is this: We are culturally ingrained to want more stuff--big houses, fancy cars, expensive (and generally useless) schooling for our kids, and on and on--rather than to want more time to enjoy ourselves and one another. Wanting more stuff feeds the economy as it exists. It leads to evermore exhaustion of the planet and evermore money in the pockets of the rich. We have stuff but little time to enjoy it.
The dominant role of work in identity might be said to also reflect the time when various communities determined that they needed surnames to better identify themselves and many took the name of their trade or occupation. I have known a number of Sawyers over the years but have never met anyone practicing that trade. Having spent 30 years in government service as a diplomat who when posted abroad was considered to always be available for duty I sympathize with the reality about make work jobs though I also found that different people given the same responsibilities could either make a real contribution or could simply fill the the role for a time.
I've had two periods of prolonged unemployment or under employment in my adult life. Each time, I have been more than able to fill most of the time with purposeful work that brought me a lot more self esteem and sense of accomplishment than nearly any job I've had has provided.
During the first period, our child with Aspergers was struggling in school in ways that made conventional employment with limited time off and no scheduling flexibility untenable.
What did I do with all my free time? I ended up taking on three different volunteer roles of varying commitment. One was roughly equivalent to working about 15 hours a week, but was mostly flexible and bought me a lot of goodwill with teachers and staff at my son's school... which helped me garner tremendously more empathy AND resources for him to succeed at school. By investing my time in the school, I received critical social and practical investment back in turn for my son's benefit. It was worth every hour. My other roles served general community interests and advocacy and gave me a good outlet for my professional skills and interest in helping others, but without being a 40 hour a week expectation. This was the time in my life when I felt I was *actually* having the most positive impact on the world as a person. If someone had wanted to pay me to keep doing it even once my son no longer needed the support, I would have LOVED that.
This second time, having been pushed to the edge of my patience for intentional stupidity and being undervalued during the pandemic I've basically become the contractor responsible for making many long postponed, but necessary maintenance projects and upgrades to our aging house. I also redoubled my efforts at my sewing and wood working hobbies. Coupling these tasks with listening to podcasts and audiobooks, I feel like I'm still pretty well intellectually engaged most of the time.
I can't say we've made up my lost income in the savings of doing the labor of these things myself, but the sense of satisfaction of having learned to do these things myself is priceless, and it's an investment in learning I can continue to build upon now that I have a lot more confidence. I've also invested more effort into intentional meal planning, so we're eating a lot healthier, have minimal food waste, and the grocery budget is pretty consistent (and lower than it was) from month to month.
Investing in my home and my family has brought me a lot of purpose and sense of accomplishment. If I could find a suitable part time job, I might consider it, but for right now what many companies demand is too much for what they actually pay, and there really ends up being no reward for being more efficient and better at the job than just getting assigned EVEN MORE WORK in way too many settings.
Now, when I've finished my "to do" list for the day, I CAN BE DONE and spend the rest of my free time however it suits me, instead of being expected to stay at work for a set amount of time because the churn of the responsibilities never ends and always exceeds what can reasonably be done by the always inadequate staffing. :P
I love reading everyone else's comments. For me in the past years work has been round the clock to the point that when there is a holiday I don't know what to do with myself. For me I feel if comes from my family, and my grandparents for that matter but my parent sa s well and my community overall. In Romania people used to be homesteaders before communism and during communism those that were too rooted to move to towns remained homesteaders. My grandparents for that reason remained homesteaders while mom and her siblings moved to town for what they though brought better perspectives. Yet every weekend they were back to the homestead helping parents(double to work I d say) . For me now across the glove I still fondly remember the lifestyle that was emersed in work. But work that is meaningful and community based and supporting the whole village . So much to say but yes for me work remains the essence of me and so far I don't see it as a burden. We run two schools and this is what we give back to the community where we are.
My first serious job was back in 1985 working in an English Residential Therapeutic Community. I was 23 and after enjoying an extremely good time before work - I welcomed the challenge and chose to work a 70-80 hour week. I did this for about 10 years and then our hours were reduced to about 65 per week. If one possibility is that work can become play - I was very fortunate.
My work was not always play but it was a great learning opportunity when it was hard. In my view, it is not a good thing that people should be restricted by government bureaucracies which are anything but playful, in deciding how to spend one's time. Thankfully I was never deprived by the imposition of the 40-hour week and my life has benefited greatly by the abundant opportunity to work/play. For the last 15 years, I have become self-employed so I can work/play as much as I like :)
How much of this phenomenon has been bolstered by the cold war? I'm thinking back to the space race, the fear-mongering, the sum of efforts to get all Americans/Westerners into the same mindset. We had to show - regardless of the soundness of the underpinnings, regardless of the cultural prices paid, that capitalism was THE right way.. lest the commies take over!
As if there isn't enough anxiety already inherent amongst Us! Yet we're taught to value the superficial BS. Who cares if we're clinically anxious or depressed, as long as we can maintain the facade of success, as long as we can "keep up with the Joneses"? ....Yes the war has shifted for lack of a remote enemy to having to appear to be better off than our next door neighbors.
Much of this is indeed fueled by capitalism. Companies are valued largely on their projected growth; in order to continually grow craftmanship takes the backseat to the almighty bottom line, consumerism becomes a necessity while job satisfaction suffers.
This does not feel like freedom - what we were told we've been working, if not "fighting" for during my entire life as an American.. This feels more like a bad hangover, where we've gotten artificially high and are now left wondering - with aching heads & hearts, where the F--- are we & how did we get here?
As long as we value having more stuff, especially for the sake of the appearance of status or of being a good Consumerican over genuine utility, we will find this trap inescapable - for we are fueling the phenomenon.
Perhaps you may ask yourself kindly: Do I have a need to feel or appear "better off" than other folks and have I decided to make this a core component of my life's happiness? If so, how has that worked out over time? Furthermore, how does allowing a society to determine my life values jibe with true freedom?
Ironically, the West is supposed to be about freedom and individualism - it is only We, through conscious choices, who can take that power back.
So, I don't think it's too surprising that car-centric urban planning has atomized us and made it difficult to socialize outside of work. One thing that's been found to help with people having better life satisfaction is impromptu meetings with acquaintances and friends, which is one of the underlying reasons for Barcelona's build out of Superblocks to radically increase the amount of available public space in the city.
Vox ran a series of articles about it in 2019.
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/4/9/18300797/barcelona-spain-superblocks-urban-plan
Peter, your reflections are truly insightful. It’s a pleasure to engage with perspectives shaped by such a wealth of experience, especially in a world that has evolved so profoundly over time. Thank you for sharing your thoughtful observations.
i have another take on this topic and play.
This is from an article I'm writing, which I may or may not publish:
"When my kids moved to high school I was so shocked to see the dramatic change in play forced upon them. When they were at primary school they would play every spare minute in the playgound - monkey bars and other equipment. I loved doing this with them. But there was none of this at high school. There was some exercise equipment more orientated towards older students / adults, but that was it.
Suddenly the kids were expected to be "mature" and that "that stuff is for children". I have read so much about how we force education upon our children like we are "educating them for harvard" and how they have lost their natural play. But play is a natural part of their education, as it used to be for our ancestors.
Humans existed as "hunters and gathers" for 99% of our 2.5 million year history. They were relatively peaceful people who grew up in communities where everyone looked out for everyone else. All adults looked out for all the children. In fact, allo-parenting, where multiple people raised a child was quite normal. The children learnt through play, and it didn't suddenly end when they turned 12, they could continue playing as long as they honored their other duties (so yes, some growing up was required, however it was a natural progression over time rather than a forced expected change). Respect and play was a natural part of their makeup. It makes sense that modern day humans have this instinct laid down in our DNA. But modern day morality and expectations seems to be killing it. And I believe there is an internal conflict between our nature as expressed in our DNA and societal expectations."
You talk about solutions to how we pay people differently. I have another idea for you.This is from another set of ideas I am playing with. I included a discussions of The Multiple Value Economy, as separate to our current day capitalist system that boils everything down to one thing - money. https://www.joyism.nexus/discussions/manyTokensEconomy
I haven't concluded this yet. I need to work out how this would come together, but I feel I am on to something. I'm happy to hear your thoughts:
"The Multiple Value Economy could offer an alternative to traditional, money-centric capitalism by recognizing a broader range of contributions to society, incentivizing social and environmental good, and fostering collaboration over competition. By creating tokens that reward specific domains like health, sustainability, community service, and creativity, we could create a system where wealth is multidimensional and rooted in diverse social values. This approach would empower individuals to contribute according to their passions and values, promote local economies, and reduce corporate monopolies by enabling more flexible and domain-based token exchanges. Ultimately, such an economy could support well-being and purpose-driven actions alongside financial gain, creating a more inclusive and resilient society."
You touch on capitalism. To be clear, I think Capitalism is our number one problem, but people are so caught up in it they can't see that. I don't want to bore you with my diatribe, so feel free to skip this last part if you have heard it all before. From https://www.joyism.nexus/capitalism
"Capitalism has been the dominant economic system on our planet for approximately 10,000 years, since its emergence during the Agricultural Age. This free market system allows individuals or groups to operate independently without government intervention, fostering innovation and growth.
As a result of capitalism’s prevalence, significant improvements have been made in human well-being. For instance, average life expectancy has increased dramatically from 31 years in 1900 to 72.6 years in 2020.
However, despite these successes, our planet is facing an alarming decline in its health and ability to support humanity. Unfortunately, many people remain unaware of this reality, and as a democratic world, we continue on the same path without making significant changes.
Capitalism’s primary objective is to maximise shareholder value. It is about money and nothing else.
It’s astonishing that the will of shareholders hasn’t prioritized considering people, animals, and the planet in guiding the direction of companies. Despite warnings about climate change dating back to the 1930s, discussions on necessary changes have been ongoing since the late 1980s. The first global summit took place as far back as 1996. Yet, year after year, we witness record-breaking global temperatures, alarming species extinction rates, and more. Unfortunately, nothing has changed. Capitalism’s misaligned incentives render it incapable of addressing these pressing issues.
Capitalism’s primary beneficiaries are those who already possess capital, allowing them to accumulate wealth more easily while those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder struggle to advance. Although taxation aims to redistribute wealth, the wealthy often exploit loopholes in the tax system to their advantage."
People work because the system makes them.
Indeed, John Maynard Keynes, along with many other futurists, predicted that with the increases in productivity due to technology, the average workweek would eventually shrink to 15 hours by the end of the 20th century. Of course, that clearly didn't happen, since the oligarchs took nearly all the fruits of the productivity gains since the early 1970s, thanks to neoliberalism and the oligarchs' inane and insane addiction to growth for the sake of growth, the ideology of the cancer cell which eventually kills its host.
I will say though that work was not necessarily more exhausting in previous decades. It may have appeared that way perhaps, but keep in mind that the overall PACE of work (and life in general) was much slower back then as well. Faster pace in general, and *a fortiori* if non-linear and often unpredictable, has to be at least somewhat more exhausting, if not physically, then at least mentally.
An exponentially faster pace AND the same (or greater) number of working hours as 1938 (!) is a recipe for burnout.
But yes, it is still true nonetheless that adults have literally forgotten how to play. That state of mind that people seek to experience at work? It's known as "flow". And "flow" is, at base, indistinguishable from what USED to be derived from play.
Great article overall. I definitely think we need, at the very least, a UBI and a shortened workweek.